What kind of party tries to pass CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT as a rider on legislation to avert a crisis?

Is this what the Teaparty means when it says that they want to "get back to the Constitution".What kind of party tries to pass CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT as a rider on legislation to avert a crisis?
Only the worst group of legislators ever assembled in Congress - your 2010 G0P/Tea Party - throwing the middle class overboard since Grover Norquist was a puppy.
The proposal isn't trying to pass a constitutional amendment in the bill. It's saying that a separate action must be taken to introduce and pass the amendment through regular channels (2/3 vote in each house, then sent to the states for voting) in order for a future increase in the debt ceiling to be approved.What kind of party tries to pass CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT as a rider on legislation to avert a crisis?
So, where's the demonrats plans?



I'm all for criticizing, but I hate morons who just sit and play the blame game. The House has now passed 2 different measures and both times Reid has tabled the bills. No debate, no vote.
Plus, the proposed amendment itself is partisan garbage.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/52020805/GOP-B鈥?/a>What kind of party tries to pass CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT as a rider on legislation to avert a crisis?
The Tea Party would, by holding the Republican Party hostage... The bill has no chance of passing the Senate, much less being signed by the president, or being voted on by the states...
Imagine that! A Party including a Balanced Budget Amendment on a bill about raising our borrowing limits.



You don't see any link between the two?
a party that believes in fiscal conservatism.



yes.
a dishonest party. they have fallen so far from their core values that reagan would be against them.